I will use this blog to do three things. One, provide a voice of opposition to the liberal controlled government. Two, to track their progress on promises they made to get elected (to see if they ever deliver.) Three, to vent, educate, and to work through my own frustration. Please read the ground rules if you wish to respond to this blog.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
My Day Without a Gay.
So what was the impact of a day without a gay?
Nothing for 97% of America.
Sure, Hollywood shut down because no one was there to do makeup. Some trendy restaurants in New York had longer table times because a third of the waiters never showed up. The drag fest in New Orleans and San Francisco didn’t function properly, but no one cared because the audience is all gay anyway and they didn’t show up.
Oh, and the government ceased to be productive in anyway, nope sorry. That had nothing to do with a lack of gays.
What Can I Say?
I haven’t written anything in a week. Not from a lack of fodder.
Everywhere I turn there is another issue, another problem, another lie, and another Obamanation.
I can’t keep up with them all.
Which one do I address?
1. The corrupt political system in Illinois that Obama says he has nothing to do with? (snicker, oh come on, really?)
2. The Civilian National Security Force that is developing while we all worry about the financial crisis?
3. How about the fact that the media is allowing Obama to back pedal away from nearly half of his promises made that he used to “buy” this election?
4. Or what about the elitist, no experience, all theoretical appointments he is making to his Cabinet?
5. I should be writing about Liberal Fascism that has already begun to target religions. This, by far is the most important, but no one is reading this blog anyway.
The truth this, there is too much to write about. Our country is in shambles, and all most people care about is what they are getting for Christmas. That is why we are in such trouble. We have delegated our political responsibilities to our “representatives” so we can live our lives. What we don’t understand is that those representatives have robbed us of our future.
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Dollars and Sense
The world economy is in trouble. No matter what the network and cable news programs are saying, and what program they are pitching, the world economy is unstable to say the least, and at most, on the brink of catastrophe. Trust your gut. You know it is true. Something is wrong, and no one either knows, or isn’t telling us because they don’t want us to know. Something is wrong, like never before.
Here is what I believe to be true.
China owns more U.S. debt than anyone else, and they are not lending anymore. In fact, they have decided to invest more in gold going from 600 tons to over 4,000 to diversify away from currency (12-3-08). This means that they do not see a strong future in our currency. No one else in the world is in a position to invest in U.S. debt, yet, our government has pledged $7.7 billion for recovery. This doesn’t grow on trees, China is not going to lend it to us, and we can’t get that in tax revenue if we are in a recession. The dollar has gained ground on the Yuan (WSJ, 12-3-08), but how do you trust a currency that is controlled by a government? Devaluing their currency may be the only way to stabilize their investment in U.S. Dollars for the time being. A collapse in the dollar hurts China, but none-the-less, just like any investor pouring good money after bad isn’t palatable. The shift from dollars to gold is a shot across the bow. A signal most of us wouldn’t see or understand.
The U.S. government deployed 20,000 troops WITHIN the U.S. (go to the Pentagon’s website). They are calling them ready response teams. Why now? Why at this point? This in and of itself is peculiar, but couple it with the current financial crisis and one has to ask, what are they preparing for? The terror threat level has not been increased, no one is talking about another attack from without, and it was done quietly without a lot of hoopla from either side of the isle, even though it’s in direct violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement. (Washington Post 12-1-08) Is this the second signal we should be listening to?
Back to the dollar, which is not backed by anything. There is no gold standard. The dollar exists on one thing, consumer confidence. This means that collectively we have to give the dollar value by believing that it has value. This scares me to death, and has for the better part of my life. Think about it. The only place you can spend a dollar is with someone who believes it is worth a dollar. You can’t trade it in for gold, or silver, or anything else. Today consumer confidence is not at its lowest point, (http://www.conference-board.org/economics/ConsumerConfidence.cfm) but how much would it take for us to collectively NOT believe that the dollar has value. Or more to the point, that China, Russia, or other holders don’t believe that the dollar has value.
The big three auto companies are in trouble, state and local governments are looking for handouts, big box stores, that survive on small margins and huge inventories are going under (Mervyns, Circuit City, Linens-N-Things,etc.) and there the tip of the iceberg. How many others will go under after a dismal Christmas? More to the point, how much have you, yourself or family cut back? Is it 10%, 25% or is it more? This is important to think about. If you cut your own spending by 20% (which is great for your family) what would that same amount do to the U.S. economy?
20% from every family decreases the U.S. economy closer to twice that amount. Why? Simple economics. Not only do you not buy what you do not buy, but the person who isn’t getting your purchase isn’t making additional purchases because you money isn’t there. It is at least twice the amount now that I think about it. It is a domino effect.
40% is catastrophic. It is a game changer. I am not talking about 40% loss in the stock market, that is already happening. I am talking about 40% loss in the economy as a whole. Scary.
What is the worse case scenario?
China sells off massive investments, simply trashes the dollar, or just decides not to lend us anymore money. The dollar loses value in the world market because no one believes it is worth anything. Now we have hyperinflation. Bread goes from $3 a loaf to $30 a loaf. Hyperinflation.
Don’t think it can happen?
Ever been to Mexico or Korea? Mexico’s money is in Pesos. Why isn’t a peso and a dollar worth the same? Korea is in Won. It takes nearly 1,000 won to equal a dollar. How did that happen? Hyperinflation. It may happen here too.
I used to think that the worst case scenario would be a long, deep, wide spread recession.
Not anymore.
I think the worst thing that could happen is a collapse of the dollar, hyperinflation, and a restructuring of world economics.
Think about the movies. Think The Postman or Mad Max.
Maybe that is why they have deployed 20,000 troops in the U.S.
Come to think of it, I don’t think 20,000 will be enough.
Monday, December 1, 2008
20,000 First Steps
WASHINGTON (AFP) — The US Department of Defense plans to deploy 20,000 troops nationwide by 2011 to help state and local officials respond to terror or nuclear attacks and emergencies, The Washington Post said Monday.
Citing Pentagon officials, the newspaper said the plan calls for three rapid-reaction forces.
The first 4,700-strong unit, built around an active-duty combat brigade, is based at Fort Stewart, Georgia, and is already available for deployment, according to General Victor Renuart, commander of the US Northern Command, it said.
Two additional groups will later join nearly 80 smaller National Guard and reserve units made up of about 6,000 troops to support local and state authorities nationwide, The Post said.
They will all would be trained to respond to domestic chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high-yield explosive attacks.
The newpaper said that civil liberties groups and libertarians had expressed concern that the plan could undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement.
I'm right there too. We are one step away from a federalized police force, which should scare us all. Welcome to the new world.
History is not on our side. Our incredibly short memory lets us collectively forget that centralized power will destroy individual freedom. Start reading people, or there won't be anything to fight for.
Sunday, November 30, 2008
The Real Story
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_win_causes_obsessive
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_undertakes_presidential
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/in_the_know_should_the_government
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/portrayal_of_obama_as_elitist
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/voting_machines_elect_one_of
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_runs_constructive_criticism
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/in_thanksgiving_tradition_bush
Hey, this is as good or better than anything you can watch on CNN.
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
You Go Rabbi
We are living in an era of insanity! Witness the latest attempt to remake the nature of our country, founded and established on certain principles that have been the envy of the entire world. The latest assault on our country and its values comes in the form of vicious and criminal violence against the Mormon church in Westwood, California.
Interesting how the selective self-righteous indignation on the part of the radical Gay activists is played out here: they bewail the blow to freedom and justice! But I thought we just had elections, where the majority of Californians expressed their views in a free and open manner. Are we not a nation of laws? Dare we relive the McCarthy era, where Americans were harassed and threatened with the loss of their jobs for believing in a certain way? If the Gay radicals should have their way, untold numbers of Americans would live under the threat of the Gay-Lesbian "thought police," where individuals that reject the Gay lifestyle would be sought out and have sanctions brought against them.
It's bad enough for those working in the entertainment industry here in Los Angeles, where a fog of political correctness and a bending over backwards to accommodate, even promote Gay lifestyle is in full gear. Let none dare say that this type of activity is anathema to our country, our morality, and the debauchery of our young people.
Let it be stated unequivocally: The radical Gay attack on the Mormons is the shot over the bow against the United States of America. There was a time when what a man did in his bedroom was sanctified between himself and God. Now we are being served an "in-your-face" smorgasbord of smut and licentiousness as being between people who only "want their civil rights."
Hogwash! We are dealing with the equivalent of a moral takeover of the country that has as its bedrock a belief in God and His promise for humanity. They don't want civil rights! What they desire is quasi Gay/Lesbian hegemony, where a huge "bookburning," reminiscent of the Nazis, will purge any remnants of the "Christian, White, mainstream America" that has given ALL AMERICANS the most profound scope of freedom, liberty, and justice that Mankind has yet to experience.
People have perhaps wondered: why the Mormons? Answer: they are a small, yet vocal Christian minority. They have been selected by the mobs as vulnerable, a group that might not have such massive support among America's Christians.
We who are friends of the Mormons, their patriotism, their family values, will not falter in our continued support of these dear Americans. Let us recall the Christian minister Niemoller, whose admonition during those dark years of Nazi Germany moved us to our core:
"When they came for the gypsies, I said nothing, because I wasn't a gypsy. When they came for the homosexuals, I said nothing, because I wasn't a homosexual. When they came for the Jews, I said nothing, because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the Catholics, and I said nothing, because I wasn't a Catholic......then they came for me, and there was no one left to defend me."
My fellow Americans, in the coming battle for the heart and soul of America and everything we cherish, may this call to arms be the mantra of every concerned patriot:
"WE ALL ARE MORMONS!"
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
You Think Your Government is There to Help You?
This is the fundamental problem with government. What is their role? The Founding Fathers were explicit in their thoughts.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. (The Constitution of the United States of America for those who didn’t know.)
Now let’s look at what happened yesterday, without a lot of hoopla, news coverage or fanfare.
U.S. Pledges Top $7.7 Trillion to Ease Frozen Credit (Update2) From the Drudge Report. By Mark Pittman and Bob Ivry
No you heard right, $7.7 Trillion was pledged in a congressional meeting Monday, November 24, 2008.
They wrote, “The money that’s been pledged is equivalent to $24,000 for every man, woman and child in the country. It’s nine times what the U.S. has spent so far on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to Congressional Budget Office figures. It could pay off more than half the country’s mortgages.”
Still think the government is out to help you?
By the government’s own numbers, only 18% of the mortgages are problematic. 18% are causing all the problems. (Or are they?)
Do you see the duplicity? Not yet? Let me connect the dots.
The government is going to spend $7.7 trillion dollars to sure up the economy even though only 18% of the mortgages originally were the problem. With $7.7 trillion the government, who is supposed to help you, could pay off half the mortgages in the US, including all the ones that are causing problems. They could have ended the crisis day 1, by buying and refinancing all the bad mortgages themselves. Still think they are in it for you? Maybe the govnerment isn't thre to help you anymore. Maybe they aren't there for you at all. Maybe they are not even thinking of you.
So, what is actually going on?
Maybe it is bigger than they are telling us? Maybe it is larger than they want you to know?
Here is just a thought. They aren’t telling you because they don’t want to believe it themselves.
Here is another point of view. Do I believe it all, no, I don’t. But it isn’t the first time I have heard it either. I have read similar theories in Korean economic papers, European economic papers and, now from Russia.
From The Drudge Report, 11/25/08
RUSSIAN ANALYST PREDICTS DECLINE AND BREAKUP OF USA.
Tue Nov 25 2008 09:04:22 ET
A leading Russian political analyst has said the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the country is heading for collapse, and will divide into separate parts.
Professor Igor Panarin said in an interview with the respected daily IZVESTIA published on Monday: "The dollar is not secured by anything. The country's foreign debt has grown like an avalanche, even though in the early 1980s there was no debt. By 1998, when I first made my prediction, it had exceeded $2 trillion. Now it is more than 11 trillion. This is a pyramid that can only collapse."
The paper said Panarin's dire predictions for the U.S. economy, initially made at an international conference in Australia 10 years ago at a time when the economy appeared strong, have been given more credence by this year's events.
When asked when the U.S. economy would collapse, Panarin said: "It is already collapsing. Due to the financial crisis, three of the largest and oldest five banks on Wall Street have already ceased to exist, and two are barely surviving. Their losses are the biggest in history. Now what we will see is a change in the regulatory system on a global financial scale: America will no longer be the world's financial regulator." When asked who would replace the U.S. in regulating world markets, he said: "Two countries could assume this role: China, with its vast reserves, and Russia, which could play the role of a regulator in Eurasia."
Asked why he expected the U.S. to break up into separate parts, he said: "A whole range of reasons. Firstly, the financial problems in the U.S. will get worse. Millions of citizens there have lost their savings. Prices and unemployment are on the rise. General Motors and Ford are on the verge of collapse, and this means that whole cities will be left without work. Governors are already insistently demanding money from the federal center. Dissatisfaction is growing, and at the moment it is only being held back by the elections and the hope that Obama can work miracles. But by spring, it will be clear that there are no miracles."
He also cited the "vulnerable political setup", "lack of unified national laws", and "divisions among the elite, which have become clear in these crisis conditions." He predicted that the U.S. will break up into six parts - the Pacific coast, with its growing Chinese population; the South, with its Hispanics; Texas, where independence movements are on the rise; the Atlantic coast, with its distinct and separate mentality; five of the poorer central states with their large Native American populations; and the northern states, where the influence from Canada is strong.
He even suggested that "we could claim Alaska - it was only granted on lease, after all." Panarin, 60, is a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and has authored several books on information warfare.
We will see. I am not so sure our government is out to help us.
Having three months of food and water on hand doesn’t sound so crazy now does it?
Thursday, November 20, 2008
You've Been Warned: Obama is a Socialist or Worse
People ask me all the time, “what’s the big deal? My life hasn’t changed. I still eat at Burger King, drive my Cadillac, earn a living, and watch college football. Obama/Read/ Pelosi can’t do that much."
Wanna bet?
We’ve been warned, over and over again and as far as I can tell, a little more than half the country was duped into believing that change was better. That change is what we needed. That morals, family, freedom, and religion are bad.
So for all you people out there, here is a history lesson, taught by pretty smart historical people to help you get your head on straight.
First, let’s examine how Obama won the election
#1. Get everyone to hate Bush, ride the wave, and fuel the fire:
“The art of leadership... consists in consolidating the attention of the people against a single adversary and taking care that nothing will split up that attention.” Mein Kampf, volume 1, ch. 10—1925 Adolph Hitler (1889–1945) German Dictator.
#2. Create fires so that the government can put them out, perpetuating the need for larger and larger government. (Yes this was true of Bush too.)
"Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of ‘Emergency’. It was a tactic of Lenin, Hitler and Mussolini.” Memoirs: The Great Depression, 1929-1941, p. 484—1951 Herbert Hoover (1874-1964) 31st President of the U.S.
#3. Lie. (If you don’t believe me that he lied, just wait, sooner or later all lies come to light.) Clinton, Bush, they all lie. So did Obama.
“The great mass of people... will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.” Mein Kampf, volume 1, chapter. 3—1925 Adolph Hitler (1889–1945) German Dictator
#4. “I will give tax relief to anyone under $250k.” “Cling to their guns and religion.” “look. . . The American people. . .”
“We must win the common people in every corner. This will be obtained chiefly by means of the schools, and by open, hearty behavior, show, condescension, popularity, and toleration of theirprejudices, which we shall at leisure root out and dispel.” Proofs of a Conspiracy, p. 111—1795Adam Weishaupt (1748-1830) Founder of the Illuminati
#5. Obama says “Youth, college students, your future lies with us!”
“Your child belongs to us already... What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new Community.” Speech, November 6, 1933, in Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, p. 249 Adolph Hitler (1889–1945) German Dictator.
But Obama is not a socialist! Really? Then why does everything he stands for, wants to accomplish, and wants to change come straight from socialist playbooks?
Obama says “Change We Can Believe in”
“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of ‘liberalism,’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing it happened.” Norman M. Thomas, Campaign speech—1948
Obama says “I vote Present”
“[We are] no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.” Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom: A Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People—1913
Obama says “We need to be more proactive in helping people.”
“The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self-created screen.” John F. Hyland, New York Times—March 26, 1922
Obama says “The Audacity of Hope in a new society”
“From the days of Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx... this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society... has been steadily growing.” Winston Churchill, Illustrated Sunday Herald, p. 5—February 8, 1920
Obama says “No, I am not a socialist.”
“The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always concealed by another name, and another occupation.” Letter to Cato, quoted in “Proofs of a Conspiracy”, p. 112—1795 Adam Weishaupt (1748-1830) Founder of the Illuminati
Liberals want separation between religion and state. Or is it something more sinister? The real battle of Proposition 8 and the other gay marriage bans.
“From Weishaupt through Babeuf, Marx, and Lenin, the revolutionists pushed the five abolitions, namely of monarchy and all other ordered government, of national patriotism, of property and inheritance, of all religion, and of marriage and the family.” Nesta H. Webster, World Revolution, the Plot Against Civilization— 1921
Your church is next.
“The Communists... openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions... Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality.” Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party—1848
“The great and good ends proposed by the Illuminati, as the ultimate objects of their union, are the overthrow of religion, government, and human society civil and domestic.” “The Duty of Americans, At the Present Crisis” —July 4, 1798, (in Political Sermons of the American Founding Era: 1730-1805, 2nd Edition, volume 2, part 5; 1998) Timothy Dwight IV (1752-1817) President of Yale University.
“We do not believe in eternal morality, and we expose all the fables about morality.” Selected Works, Volume 9, p. 478 Vladimir Ilich Lenin (1870-1924) Dictator USSR
“Global Warming is the new religion”
“Cosmos is my God. Nature is my God... The future society will be a totally new civilization which will synthesize the experience of Socialism and Capitalism.” Interview on the Charlie Rose Show— October 23, 1996 Mikhail Gorbachev (b. 1931) Secretary General Communist Party.
About the upcoming Democratic Super Majority
“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Lord John Dalberg, Acton Letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton—April 5, 1887 (Acton, Essays on Freedom and Power, pp. 335–36)
Obama says “I want judges that understand the poor.”
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly, we have a Constitutional government. We have something within our government... representing another form of government... ...which believes our Constitution, is outmoded and is sure that it is the winning side... All the strange developments in foreign policy agreements may be traced to this group who are going to make us over to suit their pleasure.” Speech on the Senate floor—February 23, 1954" William E. Jenner (1908-1985) U.S. Senator, Indiana (R)
My response:
“The people are the rightful masters of both congresses, and courts—not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it.” Speech at Cincinnati, Ohio—September 17, 1859 (Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Volume 3, p. 435) Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) 16th President of the U.S.
Obama says “I will disarm our nuclear arsenal. I will cut military funding.”
“If the opposition disarms, all is well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it Ourselves.” The Political Report of the Central Committee— December 7, 1927 Joseph Stalin (1878-1953) Secretary General Communist Party
Obama says “we need to work with the other economies of the world.”
“Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision... The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty... More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken.” Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era—1970 Zbigniew Brzezinski (b. 1928) CFR Board of Directors.
“They [capitalists] will furnish credits which will serve us for the support of the Communist Party in their countries.” Remembrances of Lenin, p. 147—1961 Vladimir Ilich Lenin (1870-1924) Dictator USSR
Obama says “The media is not pro libral; it is simply telling us how it is.”
“I myself was to experience how easily one is taken in by a lying and censored press and radio in a totalitarian state... a steady diet over the years of falsifications and distortions made a certainimpression on one’s mind and often misled it.” The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, pp. 247-248—1959 William L. Shirer (1904-1993) Journalist and Historian
“Whether it is television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books or the Internet, a fewgiant conglomerates are determining what we see, hear and read.” “Congress Can No Longer Ignore Corporate Control of the Media,” The Hill — June 12, 2002 Bernie Sanders (b. 1941) U.S. Representative, Vermont (I)
“Only the mob and the elite can be attracted by the momentum of totalitarianism itself. The masses have to be won by propaganda.” The Origins of Totalitarianism, chapter 3—1951 Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) German Political Philosopher
So feel better?
Oh, I see you never finished the article. American Idol is on.
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Sorry Been Busy
I am busy outsourcing my web development for my company to India.
No, I am not joking.
When I put the project out to bid, most U.S. companies came back with bids 200-300% higher than bids from other parts of the world (and they didn't look as good). There are two U.S. companies in the finals. I really like one of them.
What? I am unAmerican? Are you kidding?
Go and look at whatever it is you bought over this last week and I bet you you that it didn't come from the U.S.
I am just like you. I want good products at cheap prices. With an Obama/Reed/Pilosi super majority looming, I will save money wherever I can.
You should too. If I don't buy an American website, you might lose your job.
Monday, November 17, 2008
The Narcissistic Battle Ground
As I watch the news I see gay protesters angry at the outcome of an election, vocal about their disappointment that the majority stood up and voted against gay marriage. I see a group of people filled with hate towards religion, and community organizers, business owners and private citizens, who used the correct way to right a wrong and stand up for what they believe. I see groups of gay people who demand change, demand equality, demand justice, and demand that the majority bow to their minority point of view.
I just have one thing to say. Shuuuuut uuuup!
Why should I be tolerant of your life style when you are clearly not tolerant of mine? You believe that I should be tolerant of your choices, yet, in no way, shape, or form are you tolerant of the fact that I believe that what you are doing is immoral. Who cares whether you were born with it or not, I do not have to be tolerant of immoral lifestyle choices that go against what I believe.
You are gay, I am religious. You think that you have the right to have sex with whomever you want. I think that I have the right to believe in God, that he has a plan, that he made us a certain way to accomplish certain things.
When did your rights become more important than mine?
Why should I have to modify my beliefs to accommodate yours?
You think that I am bigot and intolerant because I don’t accept your lifestyle. But if we turn the question around, you are a bigot because you won’t accept mine. You are just as intolerant as I am. You are just like me.
But, you say, “If you don’t accept me, your religion is flawed. You are a fraud and so is your God.”
Wrong. Your argument is flawed.
Homosexuality is a chosen behavior, an actual action that is chosen, not a defining characteristic. Yet, the majority of gay people develop an overwhelming narcissistic personality. Everything that they are, everything that they do, everything that they revolve their life around is outwardly gay. In other words, they are defined first and foremost by their sexual orientation. This is not normal and in any other situation would be viewed as, well, an abnormal behavioral issue.
Let’s look at it another way. How many times do heterosexual people have to tell their family or friends, by word or deed, that they are heterosexuals? Do heterosexuals have to confirm, in words or deeds, their sexual orientation to everyone? Do heterosexuals have to run around demanding that others accept them? Do they go around promoting the fact that they are straight? Are their straight parades? Are there straight promotional functions? Are there colors to identify straightness?
No, because they do not need to justify their behavior. They do not need to define themselves based their sexual orientation. They do not need to force others to accept them. My beliefs are apparent in my words and deeds, but I am not narcissistic in them. I do not spend my day trying to get others to define me solely on my religion and forcing them to accept me as is, or else. People know me as a father, a business owner, an honest hardworking man, and a myriad of other things long before they know my religion. That is not abnormal.
If a person loved the color blue and warped their life around the color blue, painted their house blue, only wore blue cloths, and told everyone who would listen about the color blue. If they held blue parades, and only went to blue bars, if they tried to pass laws for the color blue, or tried to get everyone to accept the color blue, how would they be viewed? Again, this type of narcissism is abnormal.
So while gays run around protesting, calling people who disagree with them bigots and intolerant the questions still begs a response. . .
Why do I have to bend my beliefs so that you can impose yours on me?
Why do I have to accept your rights when you trample on my own?
Why does my life have to change so that you can live your own?
Why should I let you live your life, when you won’t let me live my own?
I do not care what you do in the privacy of your own bedroom. I do not care what you do when your door is closed. I do not care that you chose to participate in an act that I find immoral, just as I don’t care what heterosexuals do in their own bedrooms behind closed doors.
But the second that you bring the fight out from that door and try to impose your rights over mine, I will fight back. The second you try to change how I believe, teach my kids, and stand up for my beliefs, I will fight you with all the religious organizations, friends, money and energy that I can muster. That is my right in this country, take it or leave it.
Your right to be gay does not trump my right to believe.